![]() ![]() And I'm sure Marvel was excited to put their own stamp on an animated Spider-Man.Of course, all this was complicated by the fact that Disney purchased Marvel, and Disney and Sony are direct competitors.Marvel finally gets the rights back to do an animated version of their marquee character, and then they have to pay Sony to do it instead of just starting from scratch. You can imagine how unlikely THAT scenario was.So Marvel would have had to license all that BACK from Sony. Why? Because Sony owned all the specific elements (designs, storyline, etc.) to the SpecSpidey VERSION of Spider-Man.But let's assume for the sake of argument that they would have liked to. I have no idea whether Marvel was interested in continuing Spectacular Spider-Man or not.Sony no longer could, which meant SpecSpidey couldn't continue at Sony. So now only Marvel could produce a Spider-Man cartoon.But in order to win some concession on those live action feature films, Sony returned the animation rights to the character back to Marvel.Sony had originally produced SpecSpidey as part of their overall entertainment license of the Spidey property (which of course included the extremely lucrative live action films).Here's what Weisman wrote about the two-season Spectacular Spider-Man during a 2012 Q&A: Instead, the fan-favorite show ended up in "a situation where no single company could proceed with it." In 2012, ahead of the Ultimate Spider-Man reboot, Weisman explained that no "single company" canceled Spectacular Spider-Man. Asked on Twitter about a possible continuation of Spectacular Spider-Man, Weisman replied, "Sadly, no." Responding to another user who inquired about there being "any possibility" of a third season, Weisman tweeted, "I don't believe so.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |